No. Phoenix strikes dilution from the model plumbing code. Corrosive liquids, spent acids and other harmful chemicals must be neutralized or treated in an approved neutralizing device, and the waste and the treatment method must be approved before installation. Federal rules generally prohibit dilution as a substitute for required pretreatment.
“Corrosive liquids, spent acids or other harmful chemicals that destroy or injure a drain, sewer, soil or waste pipe, or create noxious or toxic fumes or interfere with the sewage treatment processes shall not be discharged into the plumbing system”
- Applies to:
- Owners, designers and plumbing contractors of Phoenix facilities that discharge acids, caustics or other corrosive waste to the drain, such as laboratories, plating shops, battery rooms and car washes
- Official fee:
- not applicable; the neutralizing device is part of the plumbing permit for the job
- In force:
- 2024 IPC as amended by Phoenix (Ord. G-7397, eff. 2025-08-01), since August 1, 2025
- Last verified:
- October 4, 2026, against the official page
The model plumbing code lets a facility handle corrosive waste in two ways: dilute it or neutralize it. Phoenix took the first option out. If your building sends acids or caustics toward the city sewer, the amended rule decides what equipment the plumbing inspector expects to see.
What did Phoenix change?
The amendment rewrites IPC 803.1. As Phoenix adopted it, corrosive liquids, spent acids or other harmful chemicals "that destroy or injure a drain, sewer, soil or waste pipe, or create noxious or toxic fumes or interfere with the sewage treatment processes shall not be discharged into the plumbing system without being thoroughly neutralized, or treated by passing through an approved neutralizing device."
Compared with the model text, the city struck these words:
- "diluted," from the list of acceptable treatments,
- "dilution or" from the device description, so the device is a neutralizing device only,
- "diluting water or" from what the device must be supplied with, leaving a "sufficient supply of neutralizing medium so as to make the contents noninjurious before discharge into the drainage system,"
- "automatically" from the device's supply requirement, and
- "or dilution" from the approval sentence, which now reads that the nature of the waste and "the method of its treatment shall be approved prior to installation."
The city's justification is one sentence: "Diluting chemical wastes is prohibited by the Clean Water Act, 40 CFR, 403.6 (d)." The federal rule is narrower than that short city justification: 40 CFR 403.6(d) prohibits an industrial user from diluting a discharge as a substitute for adequate treatment to meet a pretreatment standard or requirement, except where that standard or requirement expressly authorizes it. Phoenix's own plumbing amendment still removes dilution from this corrosive-waste treatment provision. The cost note says the change "requires neutralizing mediums in lieu of dilution." The city marks the amendment as approved in an earlier code cycle, and it is part of the 2024 code that Ordinance G-7397 put in force on August 1, 2025.
What do the key terms mean?
- Corrosive waste: a liquid, spent acid or other chemical that damages drain and sewer pipe, gives off toxic or noxious fumes, or interferes with sewage treatment.
- Neutralizing device: equipment that treats the waste with a neutralizing medium before it reaches the building drain, so the discharge is no longer harmful.
- Approved: accepted by the building official. The amendment requires the waste and the treatment method to be approved before installation, not after.
Who does this cover?
Anyone installing or changing plumbing at a Phoenix facility that drains corrosive waste: laboratories, plating and metal finishing, battery charging rooms, some car wash and cleaning operations, and any process that discharges spent acids. It applies at design and permit stage, so it lands on the designer and the plumbing contractor as much as on the owner.
Quick check: what does the rule require?
| Situation | What Phoenix expects |
|---|---|
| Spent acid drains to the building sewer | An approved neutralizing device before the discharge |
| Plan shows a dilution tank with added water | Not accepted. Dilution was struck from the code |
| Neutralizer that is not automatic | This section deletes "automatically"; the approved design and other applicable requirements still govern the device and its neutralizing-medium supply |
| New process waste, treatment method not yet chosen | Get the waste and method approved before installing |
| Ordinary restaurant or office drains without corrosive chemicals | This corrosive-waste provision is not triggered; other sewer rules still apply |
What does this look like in real life?
- A lab remodel adds a sink for spent acid. The design needs an approved neutralizing device on that waste line, with the method and the nature of the waste approved before the device goes in.
- A designer proposes a holding tank fed with extra water to soften the waste. Under the amendment, dilution is no longer an accepted treatment, so the plan needs a neutralizing device instead.
- A small shop only rinses lightly soiled parts. The answer flips: if the wastewater is not corrosive, the section has nothing to require. A shop that is unsure whether its waste counts should ask Planning and Development before it designs the drain.
What should you do next?
- 1List every chemical and process that drains to the building sewer and identify which wastes are corrosive.
- 2Have the designer specify a neutralizing device and a neutralizing medium for each corrosive waste line.
- 3Submit the waste description and treatment method with the plumbing plans so they are approved before installation.
- 4Leave dilution out of the design, including added water meant to bring the discharge within a limit.
- 5Keep the sewer discharge limits in mind too. City Code 28-8 bars wastewater with a pH under 5.0 or over 10.5, and bars dilution used in place of effective pretreatment, so neutralizing has to bring the discharge inside that range.
- 6Submit the plans through the city's current SHAPE PHX permitting process and include the waste description and proposed treatment method for review.
What do people get wrong?
- "Thoroughly diluted is fine, the model code says so." Phoenix removed dilution from the text.
- "The device has to be fully automatic." The city struck the word "automatically" from the supply sentence. The device still needs a sufficient supply of neutralizing medium.
- "A plumbing inspection approves the chemistry." The amendment asks for approval of the waste and the method before installation, which is a design-stage step.
How Do Other Valley Cities Handle It?
| Where | What applies | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Mesa | Mesa does not amend IPC 803. Its sewer code bars wastewater with a pH under 5.0 or over 10.5 and separately bars using dilution as a substitute for pretreatment, so neutralizing is the route there too, written into the sewer rules rather than the plumbing amendments. | Mesa City Code 8-4-15 Verified September 29, 2026 |
| Scottsdale | Scottsdale does not amend IPC 803 either. Its sewer code bars wastewater with a pH under 5.0 or over 10.5 or that causes corrosive structural damage, and says no user may increase process water or dilute a discharge to meet a limit. | Scottsdale City Code 49-161(b)(2) and (g) Verified September 29, 2026 |
| Tempe | Tempe leaves IPC 803 unamended and sets the limit in its sewer code: no wastewater with a pH under 5.0 or over 10.5, or that otherwise causes corrosive structural damage to the sewer system or equipment. | Tempe City Code 27-10(b)(2) Verified September 29, 2026 |
This page explains the rule. The official text at the source above governs.
- 2024 Phoenix amendments to the International Plumbing Code (Section 803.1)
- 40 CFR 403.6(d): Dilution prohibited as substitute for treatment
- Mesa City Code 8-4-15: Prohibited sewer discharges
- Scottsdale City Code 49-161: General prohibitions and effluent limits (pH limit and dilution ban)
- Tempe City Code 27-10: Prohibited discharges
- Phoenix City Code 28-8: General user prohibitions and effluent limits
Commercial Plumbing in Other Cities
- ChandlerChandler amendment to IPC 1003.3.7: how big must a grease interceptor be?
- MesaDoes a small Mesa business need separate men's and women's restrooms? IPC 403.2 and 410.2
- ScottsdaleWhen does Scottsdale require a grease interceptor?
- ChandlerCan a Chandler business get an annual permit for repeat plumbing alterations?
- ChandlerHow long does a commercial tenant improvement permit take in Chandler?
- ChandlerDoes a Chandler restaurant need a grease trap or interceptor?
More Phoenix Codes and Permits
- Commercial PlumbingCan a Phoenix business get an annual permit for plumbing alterations?
- Commercial PlumbingPhoenix City Code 28-12: Which businesses must install a grease or oil interceptor?
- Commercial PlumbingHow often must a Phoenix restaurant pump its grease interceptor, and what records must it keep?
- Commercial PlumbingWhich minor commercial plumbing jobs can be permitted online in Phoenix?
- Commercial PlumbingWhat permit does a Phoenix business need for a plumbing remodel or tenant improvement?
- Commercial PlumbingWho approves a fire line connection in Phoenix?
Related Rules and Questions
- PhoenixPhoenix restaurants: When do you need an outdoor gravity grease interceptor instead of a grease trap?
- MesaWhat can a Mesa business not put down the drain? City Code 8-4-15 prohibited discharges and limits
- Valley-WideGrease Trap and Interceptor Rules by Valley City
- FAQWhat can and can't go into a restaurant grease trap?
- FAQWhat are the plumbing requirements for a restaurant health inspection?
- FAQWhat plumbing code does Phoenix use?
- Commercial Plumbing
