In Scottsdale, no: the plumbing code says an interceptor is single-user only. Elsewhere it depends on the city, and the responsibility follows the user of the device. Chandler and Scottsdale put the cost of cleaning and records on the owner or user, so a shared tank needs a clear written lease agreement.
What other cities say
Peoria goes the other way: its code (Sec. 25-173(c)) lets the Director grant a written variance for shared or common interceptors when they meet the city's engineering guidelines. The other cities we reviewed do not publish a shared-interceptor rule the way Scottsdale does, so a shared tank in Chandler, Mesa or Tempe is a question for the plan reviewer, not something to assume. What they do publish is who carries the responsibility:
- Scottsdale 49-95(d): the interceptor is maintained by the industrial user at their expense, with written cleaning, repair and maintenance records kept at the facility for three years.
- Chandler: the owner of the FOG treatment device assumes the cost of cleaning and any maintenance or repairs.
- Mesa 8-4-22: the owner maintains the interceptor at the owner's expense and keeps records at the facility for three years.
