The recorded documents decide: the deed, the easement and any maintenance agreement. If they are silent, an Arizona appeals court has held that owners who both use a shared easement share the duty to maintain and repair it. Phoenix also generally requires each lot to tie directly to city service and treats a shared line as an exception.
What do the documents say?
Pull these first. They outrank everything else.
- 1The deeds and plats for both parcels, which show whether a line crosses the boundary.
- 2A recorded easement for the shared segment. It should say who may use the strip and may also say who maintains the pipe.
- 3A maintenance or cost-sharing agreement, sometimes inside a reciprocal easement agreement or a declaration of covenants.
- 4Lease terms, if tenants are responsible for repairs to shared lines.
An unrecorded paper may not protect you. Under A.R.S. 33-411, "No instrument affecting real property gives notice of its contents to subsequent purchasers or encumbrance holders for valuable consideration without notice, unless recorded as provided by law in the office of the county recorder." If you are buying or lending against a property, make sure the shared-line terms are recorded.
What if there is no agreement?
Arizona has a rule for shared easements. In Freeman v. Sorchych, the Arizona Court of Appeals considered two neighbors who used the same roadway easement and had no cost-sharing agreement. It concluded that "absent the creation of a duty expressly in the conveyance document or by other contract, the doctrine of equitable contribution should be extended to permit one dominant tenant to require another dominant tenant to contribute to the necessary repair and maintenance of an easement if both tenants are using the easement." The court said "the owners of the easement have the shared duty to repair and maintain the easement."
It quoted the Restatement (Third) of Property for the idea that holders who use the same improvements "have a duty to each other to contribute to the reasonable costs of repair and maintenance." And it noted that "The responsibility of each user should reflect a fair proportion of the costs."
Two cautions. The case involved a shared road, not a sewer, so a court deciding a sewer dispute would apply the principle to its own facts. And it applies when no agreement exists, because an agreement controls. If you have a dispute, an attorney who handles easements should advise you. This page cannot.
